An Anti-Secularist. Manifesto. AshisNandy. I. Gandhi said he was secular. Yet, he thought poorly of those who wanted to keep religion and politics separate. He scandalized many in India who view themselves as progressive when, in the mids, he published ‘An Anti-Secularist Manifesto’. Free from the irate polemics seen in some recent anti-religious commentaries ( here and here), his “secularist manifesto” invites constructive.
|Published (Last):||19 August 2013|
|PDF File Size:||12.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Secularism is unfairly characterised and attacked by religious leaders as a way manifesro seeking to protect their privileges. Secularism is not atheism lack of belief in God and nor is it humanism a nonreligious belief system.
It is a political movement seeking specific policy end-points. Many secularists are religious and many religious people — recognising the value of keeping government and religion separate — are secular. Secularism seeks to defend the absolute freedom of religious and other belief, seeks to maximise freedom of religious and other expression and protect the right to mxnifesto religious belief insofar as it does not impinge disproportionately mnifesto the rights and freedoms of others.
This is essentially a summary of article 9 of the European convention on human rights.
An Anti-Secularist Manifesto | Lal Salaam: A Blog by Vinay Lal
In addition secularism aims to end religious privileges or persecutions and to fully separate the state from religion which is a necessary means to that end. Protect free religious expression that does not directly incite violence or crimes against others or publicly and directly cause someone distress or alarm.
End discrimination against nonreligious belief systems or organisations by ending their exclusion from:. Where religious organisations join others in delivering public services, ensure they do so without:. Limit the right of religious people delivering public services for example marriage registrars, judges, pharmacists, or care workers to conscientiously object to carrying out lawful parts of their job to rare and specific exemptions eg doctors and abortion agreed by parliament.
Allow for reasonable adjustment to cater for religious practice in employment or in facilities eg Sikh turbans in the police force, the hijab or kara in uniform policies, and prayer facilities in the workplace but not to extend this to a blanket religious exemption based on subjective feelings, nor to impose religious practice on nonbelievers. Cease religious inculcation by the state by ending compulsory worship in schools and making religious education the study of what religions and other belief systems believe, rather than instruction in what to believe.
We are the only country outside Iran to have reserved seats in parliament for clerics. Religious people can and do stand for election in the normal way. Resist the imposition of parallel legal systems based on scripture, or the legal presumption that religious people are any more or less moral than nonbelievers.
None of this involves anything to do with doctrinal matters such as women bishops, gay priests or Latin masses, which are matters for religions. Nor does it involve the banning of religious opinion from the public square. None of it engages with what families get up to in their home, or religious leaders within their own families. If you agree with all the above, while you may be an ardent secularist, you are in no way “militant” or “aggressive”. If you agree with only most of that manifesto, you may well be a vicar.
If you oppose it all then you are probably archbishop material. The worst excesses carried out in the name of secularism — neither of which are supported by UK secularists — involve a proposed burqa ban in France and bans on religious dress in Turkish universities.
A response to the ‘secularist manifesto’ | Jonathan Chaplin | Opinion | The Guardian
They are wrong but they hardly rank compared to what is carried out by religious regimes. A manifesto for secularist change would look like this: This is why secularists: End discrimination against nonreligious belief systems or organisations by ending their exclusion from: End unjustified religious discrimination by: Where religious organisations join others in delivering public services, ensure they do so without: Disconnect religion from the state by: Work to end segregation of people based on religious dividing lines.
Catholicism Religion The papacy comment. Order by newest oldest recommendations.
A secularist manifesto
Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded.
Loading comments… Trouble loading?